翻訳と辞書 |
Ngati Apa v Attorney-General : ウィキペディア英語版 | Ngati Apa v Attorney-General
''Ngati Apa v Attorney-General'' was a landmark legal decision that sparked the New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy. The case arose from an application by eight northern South Island iwi for orders declaring the foreshore and seabed of the Marlborough Sounds Maori customary land. After lower court decisions and consequent appeals in the Maori Land Court, the Maori Appellate Court and the High Court; the Court of Appeal unanimously held that the Maori Land Court had jurisdiction to determine whether areas of foreshore and seabed were Maori customary land or not. The court also held that, "The transfer of sovereignty did not affect customary property. They are interests preserved by the common law until extinguished in accordance with the law".〔''Ngati Apa v Attorney-General'' () 3 NZLR 643 at ().〕 The effect of the decision was subsequently overturned by the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. ==Background== Justice Keith succinctly summarised how the case got before the Court of Appeal,
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Ngati Apa v Attorney-General」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|